Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Reference for Bava Kamma 229:4

אמר רב יוסף לא פליגי כאן לפני יאוש הדין עם השני כאן לאחר יאוש הדין עם הראשון

he could sue the second,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., the purchaser who would have to restore the articles without any payment at all. ');"><sup>7</sup></span> whereas in the other, where it took place after Renunciation<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Where the purchase is valid since Renunciation was followed by change of possession. ');"><sup>8</sup></span>

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Available for Premium members only

Jastrow

Available for Premium members only

Jastrow

Available for Premium members only

Jastrow

Available for Premium members only

Jastrow

Available for Premium members only
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse